Search Results for "exclusive contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "exclusive contract"

1223 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1223 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.

29 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Holds That Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract and Prior Section 9 Filing at Salem Confer Jurisdiction on Salem Courts Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Apr 2026

The revision petitioner, Waterbury Farrel, a division of Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc., Canada, filed Arb.O.P.No.103 of 2019 before the Principa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitrator Appointment in ISRO Contract Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Appointment by Delhi Arbitration Centre without consent of Union of India held invalid under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Union of India represented by the Ministry of Space (ISRO), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining Enforcement of Singapore Anti-Suit Order in NCLT Oppression and Mismanagement Dispute. Court holds that disputes under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 are non-arbitrable and exclusively triable by NCLT, and that an anti-suit injunction from a foreign court cannot be enforced in India to prevent a party from pursuing statutory remedies before the NCLT.

11 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Anupam Mittal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking an anti-anti-suit injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing an ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

23 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Foreign Company in Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Foreign Award Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Challenge to Foreign Award Lies Only Under Sections 47-48 for Enforcement, Overruling Bombay High Court's Reliance on Bhatia International.

26 Nov 2020

The appellant, Noy Vallesina Engineering SpA (now Noy Ambiente S.p.a), an Italian company, challenged a judgment of the Bombay High Court which held t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Refuses Leave Under Clause 12 of Letters Patent in Summary Suit for Recovery of Price of Goods — No Part of Cause of Action Arises Within Court's Jurisdiction. The court held that the making of contract and payment of advance in Bombay did not constitute part of cause of action where goods were to be delivered in Pune, applying A.B.C. Laminart v. A.P. Agencies.

19 Nov 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Polycab Wires Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit in the Bombay High Court against the respondent, M/s. Eta Engineering Pvt. Ltd., fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Summary Judgment in Commercial Contract Dispute. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Purchase Order Held Inapplicable as No Cause of Action Arose at Stipulated Venue.

1 Apr 2013

The respondent, Shell Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the appellant, Aglowm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — State Not Liable for Delay in Obtaining Approvals. The court held that the State Government did not breach the Joint Venture Agreement by failing to obtain necessary approvals within a reasonable time, as the agreement did not impose an absolute obligation on the State.

11 May 2012

The appellant, Carol Info Services Limited, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the State of Maharashtra to establish a super specialty hospit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Anti-Arbitration Injunction in Facilitation Deed Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Has Competence to Decide Validity of Underlying Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Sep 2010

The appeal arises from a commercial dispute between MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (Sony) and World Sport Group (Mauritius) Limited (WSG) concerni...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)