Search Results for "eligible assessee"

432 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 432 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment.

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Assessee's Appeal in Sales Tax Case — Revisional Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Penalty under Section 8(3)(b) of CST Act, 1956 Quashed as Assessee Was Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Driver of Vehicle.

The appellant, M/S Apotex Research Private Limited, an assessee under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed a Sales Tax Appeal under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Marhatta Chamber of Commerce Held Eligible for Section 11 Exemption Despite Business Income. Trust's incidental business activity does not forfeit exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 144C Procedure. Tribunal's Order Upheld as Draft Assessment Order Not Served to Assessee, Violating Mandatory Requirement.

The case involves an appeal by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji, dated 21 Januar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...