Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Act Case Due to Non-Supply of Legible Documents. Failure to Provide Legible Copies of Statements and In-Camera Statements Violates Detenu's Right to Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Avhdut Narayn Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging an order of preventive detention dated 29th January 2026 passed by the Distri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay and Lack of Public Order Element. Single Crime and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Umesh Shivaji Vetal, challenged an order of detention dated 09.06.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahilyanagar, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Based on Single Criminal Case Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Possibility of Bail and Continued Dangerous Activities.

The petitioner, Mohsin Anwar Khan @ Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 24th February 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPID Act for Non-Supply of Vital Bail Documents. Failure to furnish bail application and order to detenu violated Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8(b) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Hemchand Somnath Gupta, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offender...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Anticipatory Bail in NDPS Case Involving Commercial Quantity of Ganja. Custodial Interrogation Necessary When Recovery Exceeds Commercial Quantity and Accused Is Named in Statements of Co-Accused.

The petitioner, Haridas Shankar Gaikwad, aged 52 years, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Sectio...