Search Results for "daily wage employee"

295 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 295 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Para-Teachers Seeking Regularisation in Jharkhand. Contractual Engagement Under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Does Not Confer Right to Absorption or Pay Parity with Regular Teachers.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by para-teachers engaged under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in Jharkhand, challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Reinstatement Without Back Wages for Daily Wage Workers in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Daily Wage Sweepers by Municipal Corporation Held Illegal Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but Back Wages Denied for Lack of Proof of Unemployment.

The petitioners, four daily wage sweepers (Safai Kamdars), were initially employed by the erstwhile Joshipura Nagarpalika in 1999. Upon merger of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Daily Wagers in Forest Department Termination Case. Oral Termination Without Due Process Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU and PULP Act.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra through the Forest Department challenging the judgment and order dated 19 Nove...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Part, Enhances Compensation for Daily Wage Worker Instead of Reinstatement. The Court held that reinstatement is not automatic for daily wage workers and monetary compensation is appropriate, especially when the dispute is raised after a long delay.

The case involves an appeal by the State of Uttarakhand against the High Court's order directing reinstatement of a daily wage worker (Beldar) who had...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for Apprentice Development Officers of LIC. Apprenticeship Training Scheme under Section 18 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 does not create employer-employee relationship or right to absorption.

The petitioners, a group of individuals who were engaged as apprentice development officers by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under a t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for LIC Apprentices — Apprentices Act, 1961 Overrides Industrial Disputes Act. Apprentices engaged under a statutory scheme are not employees and have no right to absorption.

The petitioners, engaged as apprentices by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under the Apprentices Act, 1961, filed writ petitions seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards in Muster Roll Employee Reinstatement Cases. Muster Roll Employees Working for 240 Days in a Calendar Year Are Entitled to Reinstatement Under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present batch of writ petitions was filed by the State of Maharashtra and its officers challenging the common judgment and order passed by the Lab...