Search Results for "court receiver"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "court receiver"

908 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 908 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Company in Share Ownership Dispute — Respondent Declared Absolute Owner of 3,90,682 Equity Shares and Awarded USD 114,041 with Interest. The court affirmed the Commercial Court's decree under Section 13(1-A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, holding that the appellant failed to establish any error in the impugned judgment.

7 Apr 2026

The appellant, Komtech Plastic Technologies India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a commercial appeal und...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Implead Trust Members in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Held That Necessary Parties Must Be Joined Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

30 Sep 2022

The petitioners, who are trustees and office bearers of Shree Beereswara (Channakeshwara) Swamy Seva Trust, filed a writ petition challenging the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Arbitral Award in Hire Purchase Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 36% to 24% per annum. Court holds that 36% per annum interest on delayed payments is penal and excessive, and reduces it to 24% per annum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jan 2015

The petitioners, Ashwin Crane & Construction and Ashwin Virji Dhame, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Suit as Barred by Res Judicata and Limitation in Family Property Dispute. Consent decree in earlier suit and ouster of co-owners bars subsequent suit for partition under Section 11 CPC and Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

4 May 2012

The plaintiffs, Rusi Hormusji Pavri and others, filed a suit for partition and declaration of co-ownership of 'Pavri House' against the defendants, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favour of Plaintiff Sister in Property Dispute Against Brother — Declaration of Ownership and Appointment of Court Receiver Ordered. Plaintiff established prima facie ownership based on MHADA allotment and payment of consideration, leading to interim protection pending suit.

16 Apr 2012

The plaintiff, Shashikiran Ashok Parekh, filed a suit seeking declaration of ownership of a flat originally allotted to her by MHADA in 1974. She paid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Restraint Order Set Aside as Arbitrator Already Appointed and No Urgent Relief Required. The court held that a Section 9 petition is not maintainable after the appointment of an arbitrator, as the arbitrator can grant interim measures under Section 17 of the Act.

22 Jun 2006

The appellant, Prakash Boolu Kundar, filed an Appeal from Order against the judgment and order dated November 18, 2005 passed by the Joint District Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Contempt of Court in Winding Up Case - Breach of Undertaking and Removal of Seals Leads to Conviction. Wilful Disobedience of Court Order Constitutes Civil Contempt Under Sections 2 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

7 Jun 2005

The present show cause notice was issued under Section 2 read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and Article 215 of the Constitution ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Consent Terms Not Binding on Applicants Under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC. Court holds that applicants who were not parties to consent terms are entitled to restoration of possession or alternative accommodation.

8 Apr 2005

The case involves an appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against an order of a learned single Judge in a Chamber Summons taken out by Responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Execution Decree in Property Suit — Held that Execution Court Cannot Go Behind Decree and Must Execute It as It Is. Objections Regarding Fraud and Transfer of Property Must Be Raised in Suit or Appeal, Not in Execution Proceedings Under Section 47 CPC.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Sukumar Estates Ltd. (now Kumar Housing Corporation Limited), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Lease of Trust Property by Trustees, Upholding Validity of Lease Under Section 36 of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. Court holds that trustees have power to lease trust property for a term exceeding one year with sanction of Charity Commissioner, and that the lease in question was validly granted.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court. The first petition (WP No. 1486 of 1994) was filed by M/s. N.D. Construction,...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)