Search Results for "conditional deposit"

395 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 395 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 25% Pre-deposit for Waiver of Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Legal Heirs of Guarantor Must Deposit 25% of Section 13(2) Notice Amount as Condition for Hearing Appeal on Merits.

The petitioners, Smt. Julie Amitabh Parekh and others, who are the legal heirs of the deceased guarantor Amitabh Arun Parekh, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Non-Compliance of Land Acquisition Order. Conditional Order Does Not Amount to Willful Disobedience Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Chinchwad Devasthan Trust, a public religious trust, owned land admeasuring about 1,05,400 sq.m at Bhosari within the jurisdictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Guarantee and Pledge Against Company Pending Company Law Board Proceedings. Alleged Fraudulent Assumption of Liability by Directors Without Shareholder Consent Raises Serious Questions to be Tried.

The applicant, Rajinder Kumar Malhotra, filed an application in a pending company appeal seeking an interim injunction to restrain HDFC Bank from reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Ex Parte Decree in Summary Suit for Dishonoured Cheques Under Order 37 CPC. Defendant's Failure to Comply with Conditional Leave to Defend Results in Entitlement to Judgment Forthwith.

The plaintiff, M/s A B and U Communication Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Ex Parte Decree in Summary Suit for Dishonoured Cheques Under Order 37 CPC. Non-compliance with Conditional Leave to Defend Results in Forfeiture of Right to Cross-Examine.

The plaintiff, M/s A B and U Communication Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Husband Guilty of Contempt for Wilful Disobedience of Maintenance Order. Non-compliance with Family Court's maintenance order for over two years despite notice of contempt petition amounts to wilful disobedience under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The contempt petition was filed by the wife, Amita B Devnani, against her husband Bhagwan H Devnani and others, alleging wilful disobedience of an ord...