Search Results for "complaint filing place"

4006 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4006 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Atrocities Case for Lack of Public View and Mens Rea. Alleged Caste-Based Insults Made in Private Office Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of the same First In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Individual Workmen's Complaints for Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Dismissed Complaints Holding Recognised Union Had Exclusive Right to File Such Complaints, and High Court Finds Need for Factual Adjudication on Merits.

The writ petitions arose from a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Pune, dated 13-3-1996, which dismissed 63 workmen's complaints seeking perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors for Alleged Failure to Furnish Information in Auditor's Report Under Section 217(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Inordinate Delay of 5-7 Years in Issuing Show Cause Notice Held Unreasonable and an Abuse of Process.

The petitioners, who were directors of M/s Timblo Private Limited, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings Based on SEBI Consent Order. The Court Reviews the Effect of Consent Order under Sections 11 and 11B of the SEBI Act on Pending Trial for Offences under Indian Penal Code and Prevention of Corruption Act.

The petitioner, an accused in two criminal cases arising from alleged illegalities in the Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) of Yes Bank Limited and Infr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Under Articles 226 and 227 and Section 482 CrPC to Quash Anticipatory Bail in Rape and Assault Case; Victim Alleges Police Complicity and Brutality, Seeks Transfer of Investigation to COD.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 378(4) CrPC in Section 138 NI Act Case - Appeal Against Acquittal in Private Complaint Lies Under Section 378(4) CrPC, Not Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

The case involved a reference to a larger bench to resolve a conflict regarding the maintainability of an appeal against acquittal in a prosecution un...