Search Results for "cheque number"

615 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 615 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 NI Act. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Stands Unless Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Harshadkumar Vaikuthram Halani, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Attracted as Complainant Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, S.S. Ramesh, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses High Court Conviction Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Accused's Defence of Blank Cheque Misuse and Absence of Loan Disbursement Raises Probable Doubt, Rebutting Presumption Under Section 139.

The case involves a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant, ANSS Rajashekar, was accused by the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court restored conviction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of two cheques of Rs.1 lakh each.

The appellant, M/s Radhesham Laxminarayan and Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Applicant Director Not Involved in Day-to-Day Affairs of Company, No Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 NI Act.

The applicant, Vijay Khairatilal Bhatia, was accused No. 5 in a criminal complaint filed by respondent No. 1, Ashwin Ramesh Mittal, under Section 138 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's Appeal Dismissed as Loan Not Established as Legally Recoverable Debt Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Girdhari Parmanand Motiani, filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of the respondents, Vinayak Bhagwan Khavnekar and another,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Complaint Against Former Technical Advisor in Cheque Dishonour Case. Petitioner Not a Director or Incharge of Company Affairs at Time of Cheque Issuance, Hence Not Vicariously Liable Under Section 138/141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, M.M. Pangarkar, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of complaint S...