Search Results for "accidental omission"

291 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 291 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation. Conviction under Section 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellants abetted deceased's suicide, though cruelty under Section 498-A IPC was established.

The present appeal arises from the conviction of three appellants (husband, brother-in-law, and father-in-law of the deceased) by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Acquittal Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Acquittal of Husband and Father-in-Law for Murder and Cruelty Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 498A r/w 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Mohan Raghunath Gavade (A-1) and Raghunath Dnyanu Gavade (A-2) for offences under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder of Wife in Dowry Demand Case. Circumstantial Evidence of Dowry Demand and Cruelty Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Sessions Case No. 112 of 1991. Criminal Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Dowry Harassment Case — Life Imprisonment for Setting Wife and Daughter on Fire. Dying Declarations of Victim Held Reliable and Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 302, 307, and 498-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Kailas Maruti Gunjal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 498-A, 302, and 307 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death and Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Abetment. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove harassment or instigation leading to suicide.

The appellants, Arjun Babarao Parche, Babarao Bhimrao Parche, and Kamlabai Babarao Parche, were convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Ward...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Cruelty. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Narsing s/o Shankarrao Talnikar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nilanga, in Sessions Case No.10 of 2010 for the murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand soon before death.

The case pertains to the death of Shaheen, who was married to Abdul Aziz (accused No. 2) on 12th April 1996. After marriage, she resided with her husb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder of Daughter Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Suspected Infidelity. Appellant's Suspicion of Wife's Infidelity Led to Killing of Two-and-a-Half-Year-Old Daughter by Drowning in Well, Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Confirmed.

The appellant, Raju Kisan Mane, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his two-and-a-half-year-old daughter Aishwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Oral Agreement for Sale of Basement Premises. Agreement Not Proved and Relief Barred by Limitation and Doctrine of Part Performance.

The plaintiffs, a partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement dated 30.11.1977 for the purchase of a basement-cum-god...