Search Results for "Section 78(3)"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will Dated 1977 Despite Limitation and Forgery Challenges. Executor Succeeds in Proving Due Execution and Testamentary Capacity of Testator Who Died in 1979.

The plaintiff, Suresh Manilal Mehta, filed a petition for probate of a Will dated 16th March 1977 allegedly executed by Rameshchandra Jamnadas Dalal (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Executor Despite Allegations of Suspicious Circumstances. Will executed by testatrix with firm signature and solicitor-drafted formality upheld as valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, Chittaranjan N. Negandhi, sought probate of a Will dated 24th May 1973 left by his mother, Bhanumati Narottamdas Chapsi. Bhanumati died...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Release of Seized Minerals in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Failed to Establish Ownership and Transport Permits Were Invalid

The petitioner, a partner in Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner's Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Under Composite Notification. Absence of Separate Section 4(1) Notification Not Fatal When Landowner Consented and Government Had Taken Possession.

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land belonging to Vijay Cotton & Oil Mills Ltd. by the State of Gujarat. In 1949, the Government took posses...