Search Results for "Section 304A IPC"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Minor Deceased. Compensation of Rs. 4,50,000 Upheld as Vehicle Involvement and Negligence Proved Despite Delay in FIR.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a minor deceased, Mehulbhai Thakorbhai Patel, who died due to injuries sustained i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Driving License in Motor Vehicle Act Case — Lack of Notice and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. License Suspension Order Set Aside as Authority Failed to Provide Show Cause Notice Before Suspension Under Section 19(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Neelappagouda S/o Virupaxgouda Patil, was a driver employed with KSRTC. On 25.08.2014, while driving a bus bearing No.KA-19F/2461 on N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Claimants' Appeal Against Exoneration of Insurer in Motor Accident Claim Due to Owner-Driver's Lack of License. Liability on Owner as Pay and Recover Principle Not Applied Where Offending Driver is Father of Claimants Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arose from the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in MVC No.3616/2020. The claimants, the children of the deceased Sm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by State Transport Corporation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs. 90,429/- with 7% Interest for Injuries Sustained in Bus-Tempo Collision Affirmed.

The appellant, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, challenged the Judgment and Award dated 14th January 2020 passed by the Motor Accident Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence Established by Criminal Proceedings — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of Non-Examination of Eye Witnesses.

The present appeal arises from the dismissal of a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribun...