WRIT PETITION NO. 151 OF 2019
15 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Section 160 Evidence Act"
841 result(s) found
Found 841 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.
31 Jan 2018The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...
- 77
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Ejectment of Tenant in Delhi Rent Control Act Case Due to Second Default and Limitation Bar on Standard Rent Claim. Proviso to Section 14(2) Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Mandatory, Precluding Second Benefit, and Tenant Cannot Circumvent Limitation Under Section 12 by Raising Standard Rent as Defense in Ejectment Proceedings.
15 Sep 1969The dispute arose from a landlord-tenant relationship governed by the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The appellant, Man Mohan Chawla, had been a tenant...
- 13
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Civil Revision Application in Eviction Proceeding under Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954. Landlord's contention of alternate accommodation by tenant and willful default were key issues.
31 Jul 2013The dispute centered on a shop admeasuring 15' x 20' ft. out of House No.1270/6 at Gunj Golai, Latur, owned by the late Vishwambhar Kulkarni. After hi...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Wakf Board's Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Dargah and Graveyard. Court Holds That Wakf Board Can Sue for Declaration and Possession Without Prior Notification Under Section 6 of Wakf Act, 1954, and That Adverse Possession Cannot Be Claimed Against Wakf Property.
26 Feb 2016The appellant, Maratwada Wakf Board, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment of the fir...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision in Kerala Private Forests Vesting Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Land Reforms Act is Conclusive Proof of Title and Possession. The Court held that land under personal cultivation with a certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 is exempt from vesting under Section 3(2) of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971.
22 Jan 2019The State of Kerala appealed against the High Court's judgment allowing the respondent's claim that his land was not a private forest and thus exempt ...
- 270
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment in Suits for Declaration, Injunction, Partition, and Dissolution of Partnership — Property Dispute Involving Sites in Mysore and Bangalore
10 Nov 2021The Regular First Appeals RFA No.37/2003 and RFA No.84/2003 were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the common j...
- 25
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 153C of Income Tax Act for Non-Supply of Satisfaction Note. Failure to Provide Satisfaction Note Recorded by the Assessing Officer Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Renders the Notice Invalid.
3 Feb 2026The petitioner, Nirma Limited, received funds from Siddhi Vinayak Cement Private Limited during Financial Years 2009-10 to 2011-12 by way of share app...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.
15 Oct 2024The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...
- 646
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds Labour Court Order Holding Res Judicata Applies to Finding on Fairness of Domestic Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act. The finding recorded in an approval proceeding under Section 33(2)(b) on the issue of whether the domestic enquiry was fair and proper operates as Res Judicata in a subsequent challenge to the dismissal before the Labour Court.
8 Jul 2025The petitioner, Fouress Engineering Karmika Sangha, a trade union representing three workmen (K. Muniyappa, K. Chandrashekar, and G. Krishnamurthy), c...
- 37
