Search Results for "Sanction for prosecution"

313 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 313 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet in Insecticide Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. The court held that the complaint was not filed by a duly authorized Insecticide Inspector and no valid sanction was obtained under Section 31 of the Insecticide Act, 1968.

The applicant, Tajraj s/o Yadorav Chavhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIR No. 0244/2023...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Prison Offence Case Due to Lack of Sanction — Conviction Under Section 58 of Karnataka Prisons (Amendment) Act, 2022 Quashed as Prosecution Initiated Without Mandatory Previous Sanction Under Section 59 of the Act.

The petitioner, Shakuntala W/o Bhogappa Nayak Desai, was convicted by the V Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Vijayapur in C.C. No. 9213/2022 for an of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servants for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 Cr.P.C. — Allegations of Trespass and Assault Found to Be in Discharge of Official Duty.

The present criminal petition was filed by Shantinath and Kuntinath (petitioners/accused) under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servants in Misappropriation Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts Alleged Were in Discharge of Official Duty, Making Sanction Mandatory.

The petitioners, who were public servants working as Junior Engineer, Assistant Account Officer, Gram Sevak, and Junior Engineer in Panchayat Samiti U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 155 of Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that prosecution under Section 135 cannot proceed without a complaint by an authorized officer as mandated by Section 155.

The applicant, Sou. Vimal w/o. Murlidharrao Suradkar, filed a criminal application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of t...