Search Results for "SEBI jurisdiction"

235 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Penalty Case for Wrongful DTAA Claim — No Concealment Found. Assessee's Bonafide Belief That India-China DTAA Applied to Hong Kong Based on Official Document Precludes Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The revenue appealed against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which set aside the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Independent Application of Mind by AO. Dividend Stripping Provision Under Section 94(7) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Not Applicable Where Assessee Suffered Net Loss on Sale of Mutual Fund Units Exceeding Dividend Received.

The petitioner, Karan Maheshwari, an individual investor in shares, stocks, securities, and mutual funds, challenged a show cause notice dated 20 Augu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Listed Company Seeking Copies of Seized Documents from GST Intelligence. Right to Copies Implicit Under CGST Act to Enable Compliance with SEBI Regulations and Audit Requirements.

The Petitioner, High Ground Enterprises Ltd., a company listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange with over 10,000 shareholders,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Alleging FDI Violations in Insurance Sector as Motivated by Personal Interest. Petitioner's failure to disclose material facts and filing of multiple petitions with similar allegations leads to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Sambhaji Savakar Jadhav, filed three public interest litigation petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favour of Constituent in Stock Trading Dispute. Court upholds award based on documentary evidence and rejects challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Capital & Debt Market Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, challenged an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute for Lack of Reasons and Non-Consideration of Margin Requirements. Award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 set aside as Arbitrator failed to consider deposit and margin obligations of client.

The Petitioner, Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers Ltd., a share and stock broker and member of NSE, challenged an arbitral award dated 15 October 20...