Search Results for "Rule 11-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Rule 11-A"

349 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 349 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal by Pollution Control Board in Water Pollution Case — Sanction for Prosecution Valid Under Section 49 of Water Act. Chairman's Sanction Pursuant to Board Resolution is Sufficient Compliance with Section 49 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

17 Mar 2026

The Gujarat Pollution Control Board (Appellant) filed a criminal complaint against Respondent No. 2 and others for violation of Sections 24 and 25 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Demat Accounts of Promoter for Non-Compliant Company Under SEBI Circulars — Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Freezing of all securities held by a promoter in a non-compliant company, including unrelated investments, without notice or hearing is arbitrary and illegal under Article 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.

26 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed two writ petitions filed by Dr. Pradeep Mehta and his son Neil Pradeep Mehta challenging the freezing of their demat acc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Challenging High Court's Setting Aside of Ex Parte Decree in Specific Performance Suit. High Court's Intervention Under Article 227 Upheld as Ex Parte Decree Was Nullity Due to Non-Appointment of Guardian for Minor Defendant Under Order XXXII Rule 3 CPC, Despite Defendants' Negligence and Delay.

16 Jul 2021

The dispute originated from a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement, where the plaintiffs obtained an ex parte decree against the defendan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration — Holds Designated Committee Cannot Reopen Final Assessment Order. Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 declaration must be processed based on declared tax dues as per final assessment order, not on show cause notice demand.

9 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Eureka Fabricators Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturing unit holding central excise registration, was issued a show cause-cum-demand notice date...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for De-requisition of Lands Under Requisitioning Act — Compensation Already Determined and Property Not Released. The Court held that the appellants' remedy lies in seeking compensation enhancement, not de-requisition, as the property was not released within the statutory period under Section 6(1A) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952.

24 Nov 2020

The case involves an appeal by special leave against the Karnataka High Court's judgment dated 11.01.2008 in W.P. 8340/2006. The appellants, B.K. Ravi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Daily Wage Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Refusal of reinstatement and back wages upheld as employee worked only for 4 years and compensation of Rs. 25,000 deemed adequate under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

4 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Jagdish s/o Karuji Bombarde, was a daily wage employee of the Municipal Council, Tumsar. He was appointed in February 1997, transferre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

24 Aug 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 as Ultra Vires Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act. Rule restricting transfer of mining leases to minerals not specified in First Schedule held inconsistent with parent Act.

1 Dec 2016

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 8(1)(a) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

1 Dec 2016

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Notices Against Directors in Central Excise Case — No Personal Liability Without Specific Statutory Provision. Directors of a company cannot be treated as assessees or deemed to be in default for excise duty demands under the Central Excise Act, 1944, in the absence of a provision akin to Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Sunil Parmeshwar Mittal and Kirti Trambaklal Shah, were directors of a company that was assessed for excise duty. The Deputy Commissi...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)