Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

464 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 464 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Winding Up Order for Non-Payment of Debts Under Companies Act, 1956. Debt Acknowledged in Balance Sheets and Not Disputed, Constituting Admission of Liability Under Section 433(e) and 434 of Companies Act, 1956.

2 Apr 2018

The judgment arises from four appeals filed by M/s. RojeeTasha Stampings Private Ltd., M/s. Automotive Metal Stampings Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ganage Pressing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Specific Performance Suit Involving Share Buyback Under Letter of Undertaking. The appeal challenges the grant of interim injunction on grounds that the agreement is not a concluded contract and that its performance would breach MIMPS Regulations making it void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

11 Sep 2015

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arises from an order dated 13 October 2014 passed by a single judge granting interim inj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vessel Owner's Application for Release of Arrested Vessel Due to Repeated Breach of Undertakings and Contempt of Court. Auction Purchaser's Application for Confirmation of Sale Allowed as Vessel Owners Failed to Furnish Security in Time.

24 Mar 2021

The case involves a commercial admiralty suit filed by GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd & Anr against MV Golden Pride & Ors. The vessel was arrested. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Execution of Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — Decree Not Null and Void Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That a Consent Decree Can Be Executed Even If It Contains Terms Beyond the Suit, Provided Parties Freely Consented.

20 Dec 2018

The case arises from a commercial suit (Suit No. 119 of 2016) filed by Mahesh P. Raheja, Preeti P. Raheja, and Shakuntala P. Raheja (Respondent Nos. 1...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

21 Dec 2010

The High Court of Bombay, on its own motion, initiated contempt proceedings against Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, an advocate, based on an incident that occurred...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Commercial Suit Regarding Applicability of 120-Day Timeline for Written Statement. The mandatory timeline under Order V Rule 1 CPC as amended by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply to suits filed before the Act's enactment and subsequently transferred under Section 15.

28 Jan 2021

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court. The su...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Winding Up Petition for Non-Payment of Goods Supplied Under Companies Act, 1956 — Debt Acknowledged and Not Disputed in Good Faith. The court held that the respondent company's defence did not constitute a bona fide dispute and the debt was due and payable under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956.

1 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Castrol Limited, filed two company petitions under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up of the respondent com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.

15 Nov 2006

The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Defendant's Right to Raise Jurisdictional Objection Not Waived by Filing Written Statement. The court held that Order VIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 does not bar a defendant from raising a jurisdictional objection after filing a written statement, and that the trial court must decide such objection as a preliminary issue under Section 9A of the CPC.

14 Jul 2023

The appellant, Niloufer Soli Lam, was the original defendant in a suit filed by the respondent, Zarir Pesi Bharucha, seeking possession and mesne prof...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Disputed Consent Terms. Consent Decree Set Aside as Court Failed to Verify Genuineness of Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

20 Sep 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 28 September 2012, which made absolute a motion for recordi...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)