Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

917 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 917 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Single Offence and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention

The petitioner, Ram @ Pappu Arun Kore, challenged a detention order dated 27th April 2022 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under the Mah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Court holds that the alleged offences do not affect public order and the delay vitiates the detention order.

The petitioner, mother of the detenue, challenged a detention order dated 03.03.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Act Case Due to Non-Supply of Legible Documents. Failure to Provide Legible Copies of Statements and In-Camera Statements Violates Detenu's Right to Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Avhdut Narayn Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging an order of preventive detention dated 29th January 2026 passed by the Distri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 26-Year-Old COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to Inordinate Delay in Execution — Preventive Detention Order Loses Its Rationale When Executed After 26 Years Without Explanation

The petitioners, cousins of the detenu Mohammed Ali Vengadan, filed a Habeas Corpus writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's bail status and passed the order mechanically, violating the requirement of subjective satisfaction.

The petitioner, Shri Madhukar Mahadeo Manve, challenged the detention order dated 19th August 2004 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention order set aside as 7 months and 8 days delay between crimes and detention order was not satisfactorily explained, violating constitutional safeguards.

The petitioner, Kiran Ramjan Machare, challenged a detention order dated 5 September 2023 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pimpari-Chinchwad, Pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live-Link. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Delay of 25 Days in Passing Order Not Satisfactorily Explained by Detaining Authority.

The petitioner, Mandar Ajit Borkar, challenged his preventive detention order dated 14th October 2011 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mum...