Search Results for "Notice under Section 32(2)"

369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Accused in Second FIR Case Due to Impermissibility of Multiple FIRs for Same Incident. Second FIR for Offences Under Sections 504, 332, 353 IPC Arising from Same Occurrence of Unauthorised Buntings Removal Held Inadmissible, Following T.T. Antony Principle.

The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an FIR registered at Hosakot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Service Tax Recovery Under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Petitioner's Pre-Deposit of 7.5% of Disputed Tax Entitles It to Settlement Under KVSS, 1998 Despite Pending Adjudication.

The petitioner, M. Ramzan & Co., a firm engaged in providing works contract services and holding registration under Service Tax Law, was issued a show...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Municipal Corporation in MRTP Act Notice Case — Notice Under Section 89 MRTP Act Held Valid and Not Barred by Limitation. The Court set aside the trial court decree declaring the notice invalid, finding that the notice was within limitation but the suit was premature.

The appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, filed a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the oral ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Debtors' Motion to Set Aside Insolvency Notice in Consent Decree Dispute. Failure to Pay Agreed Amount by Stipulated Date Renders Debtors Liable for Full Decretal Amount Under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

The petitioning creditor, Videocon Industries Ltd., filed Suit No. 1891 of 2000 against M/s Akar Laminators and the two judgment debtors, V.T. Seth & ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in NI Act Case, Restores Conviction Despite Change of Magistrate. Section 143 of Negotiable Instruments Act Overrides Section 326(3) CrPC, Succeeding Magistrate Can Proceed on Evidence Recorded by Predecessor.

The petitioner, Shivaji Sampat Jagtap, filed a Criminal Revision Application against the judgment of the Sessions Court which had set aside his convic...