Search Results for "Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka partly allowed Criminal Petition Challenging Arrest and Remand of Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case - Illegality in not providing grounds of arrest in the language known to the petitioners

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed by two Nigerian citizens challenging their arrest and remand in a narcotics c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Reliance on Inadmissible Section 67 Statements. Conviction for Possession of Heroin Set Aside as Mandatory Safeguards Were Not Followed and Confessional Statements Were Inadmissible Under Tofan Singh.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of Anwarkhan Jahilkhan Pathan and Firdoskhan Khurshidkhan Pathan against their conviction under the Narcotic Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Extension of Investigation Period in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Section 36A(4). Failure to Serve Notice on Accused Before Granting Extension Renders Order Invalid and Accused Entitled to Bail.

The judgment concerns five applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by accused persons in Crime No. 1089/2020 reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 52A and Delay in Trial. The court held that failure to comply with mandatory provisions of Section 52A of NDPS Act and prolonged incarceration without trial justified bail despite Section 37 restrictions.

The petitioner, Shivaraj Urs, was the second accused in a case registered by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Information and Inform Accused of Right to Search Before Gazetted Officer Leads to Acquittal.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of four appellants under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Failure to Follow Mandatory Search Procedure Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Smt. Satyabhama Kishan Kardak, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge for Greater Mumbai on 25 February 1993 for ...