Search Results for "Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888"

404 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 404 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Demolition Notice Case. Court holds that demolition notices under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 require prior show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing, upholding trial court's order setting aside notices.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (appellant) filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which set aside demolition n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Licensing Requirement for Food Business — Holds That MMC Act and FSS Act Can Coexist Without Repugnancy. Section 394(1)(e) of MMC Act, 1888 is Not Void Under Article 254 as It Operates in a Different Field of Municipal Regulation.

The petitioner, Sanjeev Rajaram Chimbulkar, a food business operator, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice in Slum Redevelopment Project. Corporation's Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Quashed for Non-Compliance with DCR 33(7) Prior Approval Requirement.

The petitioner, M/s Crescent Property Developers, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer for Refund of Octroi Duty on Imported Chemical Intermediate. Sulphonic Acid, a Raw Material for Detergents, Not Covered Under Entry 18 of Schedule H to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 as It Is Not a Substance Used in Washing.

The petitioner, Hindustan Lever Limited, a manufacturer of soaps and detergents, imported Sulphonic Acid, a toxic chemical intermediate used as raw ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Demolition of Tenanted Premises Without Notice. Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Due Process Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Before Demolishing Structures Occupied by Tenants.

The petitioners, Mrs. Lilly P. Pandit, Mr. Ivan D'Souza, and Mr. Abbas Masalawala, are tenants residing in rooms on the ground floor of 30 Mistry Buil...