Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Act, 1939"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Act, 1939"

178 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 178 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Rash Driving by Tanker Driver. No Evidence of Contributory Negligence by Deceased Motorcyclist; Compensation of Rs. 23,50,000/- with 9% Interest Upheld.

4 Feb 2026

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 31.08.2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary), Vadodara in MACP No. 87...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established. Commissioner's Award of Rs.4,23,580/- with 12% Interest Upheld as No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 30(1) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

12 Jan 2024

The New India Assurance Company Limited appealed against the award dated 17.01.2012 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Chitradurga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Pay and Recover Direction in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable Despite Breach of Policy Conditions. Goods Vehicle Carrying Passenger Does Not Absolve Insurer from Paying Compensation to Third Party Claimants; Insurer Must Recover from Owner.

23 Jun 2022

The appellant, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award date...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Employee Compensation Case — Tractor-Trolley Not in Use at Time of Accident. Employer's Liability Not Covered Under Policy as Accident Occurred During Sand Loading, Not While Vehicle Was in Use.

11 Feb 2019

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Ltd. against an order of the Commissioner under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, aw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Tractor-Trolley Accident Case — No Liability as Accident Occurred During Sand Loading, Not While Vehicle Was in Use. The Court held that the accident did not arise out of the use of the vehicle under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, as the deceased was loading sand from a river bank when the bank collapsed, and the vehicle was stationary.

11 Feb 2019

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Ltd. against an order of the Commissioner under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, aw...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Apportionment of Liability Between Two Vehicles Upheld. The court held that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was inadequate and enhanced it, considering the injuries and medical expenses, while upholding the finding of contributory negligence.

9 Mar 2015

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 15.02.2008 involving two vehicles: a car driven by respondent No.1 and a lorry driven b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim in Hit-and-Run Case Involving Multiple Vehicles and Insurers. The court held that the liability of insurers of negligent drivers is joint and several, and the claimant can recover the entire compensation from any one insurer under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

9 Mar 2015

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 20th April 2008 at about 8:30 p.m. near Yeshwanthpur Toll Gate, Bangalore. The claimant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Interim Compensation Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — No-Fault Liability Principle Applied. Tribunal's Order to Hear Application on Merits Set Aside as Premature; Interim Compensation Directed to Be Paid Within Four Weeks.

17 Dec 2011

The petitioner, Meenakshi @ Meena Ashok Jondhale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Motor Accident Claims...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Employer in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Wrong Multiplier. The Court held that the multiplier must be based on the age of the deceased (47 years) as per the Second Schedule to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, reducing the award from Rs.1,75,000 to Rs.1,45,000.

19 Jan 2010

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed under Section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The 1st to 4th Respondents (claimants) are the w...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)