Search Results for "Mentally Challenged Children"

144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Souza and Padamsee Artworks as Obscene — Customs Officer's Personal Opinion Insufficient to Brand Art as Obscene Under Section 11 Customs Act, 1962. Artistic merit and community standards must be considered before declaring artworks obscene.

The petitioner, M/s. B. K. Polimex India Private Limited, imported seven artworks by world-renowned artists F.N. Souza and Akbar Padamsee from London ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband and Mother-in-law in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty. Conviction under Section 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove willful conduct or harassment for dowry.

The case pertains to the death of Tulsabai, who was married to appellant Tukaram for 13 years and had four children. The prosecution alleged that Tuka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child below 18 years.

The appellant, Mahesh S/o Kundlik Dhavare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder and Cruelty by Husband — Kerosene Burn Death of Wife Proved by Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC confirmed as dying declaration was voluntary, consistent, and corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellant, Santosh Rajaram Wankhede, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad, for the murder of his wife, Manisha, by pouring keros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Dependency and Notional Income Determined Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal and awarded Rs. 3,60,000 compensation to the family of the deceased labourer who died in a train accident.

The case involves a first appeal filed by the appellants, who are the widow, children, and parents of the deceased Manoj Pawar, against the dismissal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping of Minor Girl. Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 5(1) and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 366A, 376 of IPC.

The appellant, Rupesh Parasram Nehare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Warora in Special (POCSO) Case No. 05 of 2015 for offences under Section 5(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Proximate Link Between Alleged Cruelty and Suicide. Conviction under Section 306 IPC Set Aside as Evidence Did Not Establish Mens Rea or Direct Instigation.

The appellant, Uttam s/o Tukadu Sonwane, was the husband of the deceased. He was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, under Section 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Brother's Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 506(II) IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dilip Madhukar Jadhav, was convicted by the 2nd Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge at Kalyan for the murder of his brother Ravindra Jadha...