Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Gambling Offences Due to Lack of Public Order Threat. Detention Based Solely on Gambling Crimes Under Maharashtra Gambling Act Fails as Isolated Incidents Do Not Disturb Community Tempo Under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The dispute involved a challenge to a preventive detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. The petitioner, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenue. Failure to Provide Grounds in Hindi or Marathi Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Vinod Tuljaram Bandichode, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA) by an order dated 10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Bootlegging Without Public Order Disturbance. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Law and Order Violations; Nexus to Public Order Must Be Established.

The petitioner, Rajendrasingh Bavari, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18.02.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Delayed Action. Preventive detention order set aside due to unexplained delay of four months and failure to supply legible translated documents.

The petitioner, Bandu Kathalu Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 17.01.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Beed under the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Grounds Were Stale and Irrelevant, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Ganesh Narayan Mane, challenged the detention order dated 08.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police...