Search Results for "Liberal Construction"

514 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 514 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape and Robbery in Case of False Promise of Marriage. Court holds that sexual intercourse on false promise of marriage constitutes rape under Section 375 IPC and that theft during such act amounts to robbery under Section 390 IPC.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 467 of 2012 filed by the convict Anand Singh challenging his conviction and sentence, and Criminal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Bearings as General Bearings Under Entry C-II-146 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court held that bearings not exclusively used in automobiles or tractors are not auto or tractor parts, applying common parlance test.

The case involves three Sales Tax References filed by M/s Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. against the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement and Counter Claim in Suit Filed Before 2002 CPC Amendment. Order 6 Rule 17 as amended by 2002 Amendment Act does not apply to suits instituted before 1.7.2002.

The petitioner, Sumita Pradipkumar Dixit, challenged an order dated 29.8.2009 passed by the trial court in RC Suit No. 187/1999, which rejected her ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to State Commission's Order Setting Aside Attachment in Consumer Dispute. Earlier writ petition challenging same order dismissed for non-prosecution; no fresh cause of action shown.

The petitioner, R.B. Upadhyay, filed a consumer complaint against Vodafone Essar Ltd. (respondent No.2) for deficiency of service on 20 March 2008, al...