Search Results for "Legally enforceable debt"

411 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 411 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant failed to prove that the cheque dated 06.03.2004 was issued towards a debt or liability that existed on that date, as the liability arose only after 50 days from the contract date.

The appellant, Kala Mines and Minerals, a partnership concern, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Failure to Rebut Presumption. Appellant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as cheque was issued as security and loan transaction not reflected in income tax returns.

The appellant, Sri Dattatraya, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Sharanappa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted by Accused Showing Loan Not Advanced.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Sri K.T. Krishnappa, against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction and Fine of Rs.1.80 Crore Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs.90 Lakhs Issued Towards Repayment of Loan — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused (Maxworth Realty India Ltd. and its Chairman & Managing Director K. Kesava) challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses High Court Conviction Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Accused's Defence of Blank Cheque Misuse and Absence of Loan Disbursement Raises Probable Doubt, Rebutting Presumption Under Section 139.

The case involves a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant, ANSS Rajashekar, was accused by the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Under Section 138 NI Act — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove That Cheque Was Not Issued for Discharge of Any Debt or Liability, Leading to Confirmation of Concurrent Sentence of Six Months.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Krishna Gudi, against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Blank Cheque Defence Rejected as Unsubstantiated. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands in favour of holder, and accused failed to rebut it by preponderance of probabilities.

The appellant, The Bagayatdar Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 of the NI Act Stands Unless Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Smt. Kiran w/o Yugalkishore Bhattad, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the 7th Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act. Settlement Agreement Creates Fresh Liability, Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, M/s. Cabral & Co. and its proprietor Francis Simon Cabral, against their convi...