Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act"

258 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 258 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT/CST Case — No Substantial Question of Law. Assessee failed to prove inter-State stock transfer; Tribunal's concurrent findings of fact upheld under Section 65(1) of KVAT Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT Dispute — Inter-State Sale of Rough Granite Blocks Not Proven as Export Sale. Assessee failed to discharge burden of proof under Section 5(1) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in KVAT Penalty Case — Assessee's Goods in Transit Not Liable to Penalty Under Section 53(7) of KVAT Act, 2003. Goods Intercepted While Moving from Pune to Bangalore with Valid Invoice; Penalty Set Aside as No Contravention of Act Established.

The appellant, M/s Jai Hind Ply, a proprietorship concern engaged in the sale of plywood, timber, and related materials, is registered under the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in VAT Case Due to Limitation Bar — Reassessment Order Passed Beyond 5-Year Limitation Under Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003 Cannot Be Sustained Despite Court Direction. Court Directions Cannot Extend Statutory Limitation Period.

The petitioner, M/s. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tax Notification Excluding Lead Sub-Oxide from Industrial Input List. Lead Sub-Oxide Held to Be an Industrial Input Under Entry 67 of Third Schedule to KVAT Act, Entitled to Reduced Tax Rate.

The petitioner, M/s A.P.S. Industries, a partnership firm engaged in the manufacture and sale of Lead Sub Oxide (Lead Oxide Grey), challenged a notifi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Sales Tax Case on Handling Charges. Handling charges for registration of motor cycles are not part of sale price under Section 2(25) of MVAT Act, 2002.

The Revenue appealed against an order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal which set aside tax on handling charges collected by the respondent, a dea...