Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946"

189 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 189 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Dispute Reference Under Repealed Act. Reference Order Saved by Savings Clause in Industrial Relations Code, 2020 and Section 6 of General Clauses Act, 1897 as It Was Made When Old Act Was in Force.

The dispute arose when Glastronix LLP, the petitioner, challenged a reference order dated 19.12.2025 issued by the Labour Department, Government of Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Labour Commissioner's Order on Subsistence Allowance Calculation Under Karnataka Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1988 — Management's Appeal Allowed as Authority Exceeded Jurisdiction by Adjudicating Disputed Facts Without Proper Enquiry.

The petitioner, Recaero India Private Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing aircraft components with 82 workmen, challenged an order dated 05.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Badli Worker in Textile Mill. Continuous Service as Badli Worker for Several Years Entitles Worker to Regularization Under Industrial Disputes Act.

The petitioner, Chalisgaon Textile Mills, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Jalgaon dated 30/04/2002, which partly allowed Complaint (U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Status of Voluntary Health Workers as Workmen Entitled to Permanency. Municipal Corporation's Scheme of Voluntary Health Workers does not create a master-servant relationship, but workers are entitled to permanency under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

This group of petitions concerns Voluntary Health Workers appointed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, particularly in relation to their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Elected Representatives Under BIR Act Have Locus Standi to File Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Neco Schubert and Salzer Ltd., an employer, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 9 January 2004 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Employee Seeking Reinstatement Beyond Age 60 — Employee Not Covered Under BIR Act as He Was Not an 'Employee' Under Section 3(13).

The appellant, Shri Vithal Bakula Kokate, was initially appointed as a Learner by Podar Mills in 1966 and later promoted to various positions, ultimat...