Search Results for "Hindu Marriage Act, 1955"

595 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 595 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Under Article 142 in Transfer Petition Due to Irretrievable Breakdown and Allows Transfer of Proceedings

The marriage between the parties, solemnised in 2012, survived only for a brief period, after which they began living separately. For more than thirte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CMA NO.2543 OF 2018

The dispute arose over the legal heirship and terminal benefits of deceased Sundaramoorthy, who worked as a clerk in the Corporation of Chennai and di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Adjudicates Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree in Cruelty Case Under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Relying on Single Incident and Unproven Allegations to Dissolve Marriage.

The case concerns a Family Court Appeal filed by the wife against a divorce decree granted in favor of the husband on the ground of cruelty under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Wife and Co-Respondent, Upholds Divorce Decree on Grounds of Adultery, Desertion, and Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Wife's Voluntary Sexual Intercourse with Co-Respondent and Desertion Established by Preponderance of Probabilities.

The case involves two family court appeals arising from a divorce petition filed by Sushil (husband) against Sangeeta (wife) under Section 13(1)(i), (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Return of Stridhan Under Section 27 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Husband Liable for Ornaments and Articles. The court held that the husband is presumed to be in possession of the wife's stridhan and must return it unless he proves otherwise.

The appellant wife, Sangeeta B. Kadam, filed a Family Court Appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 11th June 2001 passed by the Family Court ...