Hanumant Jagganath Nazirkar v. The State of Maharashtra
27 Jun 2025The petitioner, Hanumant Jagganath Nazirkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code...
Search Results for "Habeas Corpus Petition"
389 result(s) found
Found 389 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention — Personal Dispute Not Ground for Breach of Public Order. Detention Order Under Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Adverse Case Was Under Investigation and Personal Dispute Existed.
27 Jan 2025The petitioner, Usharani, mother of the detenu Madhavan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...
- 63
High Court
Madras High Court Disposes Habeas Corpus Petition as Detenue Not Under Illegal Detention. Court finds detenue living voluntarily with parents and denies marriage claim.
21 Jan 2025The petitioner, V.Vignesh, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court, seeking a direc...
- 13
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order Due to Improper Translation of Vital Document. Failure to Supply Remand Extension Order in Language Understood by Detenu Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution and Right to Make Effective Representation.
20 Jan 2025The petitioner, Kamatchi, mother of the detenu Prakash, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...
- 46
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Under Act 14 of 1982 for Lack of Public Order Threat. Preventive detention cannot be based on prohibition offences that are amenable to ordinary law.
20 Jan 2025The petitioner, Annamalai, father of the detenu Aandi, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras...
- 43
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order in NDPS Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity and Lack of Proximity of Adverse Cases. The detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 branding the detenu as a 'Goonda' was set aside as the drug involved was not commercial quantity and adverse cases lacked proximity, making ordinary law sufficient.
20 Jan 2025The petitioner, Vijayalakshmi, mother of the detenu Sivakumar @ Kittu Poonai, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition Filed by Mother Against Daughter-in-Law, Finds Collusion Between Petitioner and Alleged Detenu. Court holds that habeas corpus remedy is not available when the alleged detenu is a major who voluntarily resides with his wife and the petition is filed in collusion to harass the wife in a matrimonial dispute.
28 Jun 2021The petitioner, Shaikh Shabana, filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that her son, Shaikh Atik, was illegally detained by his wife, Mahek Hanif Sha...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Child Custody Between Parents, Directs Compliance with Magistrate's Order Under Domestic Violence Act. Habeas corpus not maintainable when child is with a parent and custody order exists from competent court; court directs father to hand over custody to mother as per magistrate's order dated 23/10/2020.
20 Nov 2020The petitioner, Leena Rupesh Chinchagharkar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition (Stamp) No.4880 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of hab...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Supply of Legible Documents and Inadequate Translation. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated.
16 Sep 2011The petitioner, Rushikesh Tanaji Bhoite, son of the detenu Tanaji Keshavrao Bhoite, challenged the detention order dated 10.1.2011 passed by the Distr...
- 80
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal, Upholds High Court Quashing of Dismissal Order of Head Constable for Violation of Natural Justice. Presiding Officer's Dual Role as Witness Renders Inquiry Void, Certiorari Available Despite Existence of Alternative Remedy.
30 Sep 1957The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a High Court order quashing the dismissal of Mohammad Nooh, a Head Constable. Nooh was dismissed after a d...
