Search Results for "Companies Act 1956 Section 111"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Companies Act 1956 Section 111"

144 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Shareholders in Capital Receipt Case — One Million Euros Received from Vedior NV Held Exempt as Capital Receipt. Compensation for Loss of Right of First Refusal and Non-Compete Agreement Treated as Capital Receipt Not Chargeable to Tax Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

8 Jan 2026

The case involves two appeals by shareholders (K. Pandiarajan and R. Hemalatha) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which up...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Prevent Proforma Defendants from Leading Evidence in Eviction Suit — Interest Not Adverse Does Not Bar Evidence. The court held that the right to lead evidence is not dependent on the nature of interest but on the court's discretion and the necessity for just adjudication under the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882.

10 May 2024

The petition challenges an order of the Small Causes Court at Mumbai rejecting the plaintiffs' application to prevent certain defendants (Defendant No...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company's Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Title Not Established. Company failed to prove ownership of acquired lands, hence no locus standi to challenge awards under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Late Filing of Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Service of Writ of Summons Not Mandatory When Defendant Has Entered Appearance and Received Plaint and Notice of Motion. The court held that the object of service of summons is to give notice, and if the defendant has already appeared and received the plaint, formal service is not required under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

21 Dec 2022

The Petitioner, Metro Ortem Ltd, a public limited company, filed a Commercial Suit No. 3 of 2019 before the Bombay City Civil Court at Mumbai against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Commercial Suit — Appellant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. The court held that the appellant's failure to appear despite service and the lack of a valid explanation for the delay in filing the application to set aside the decree disentitled it to relief under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

27 Nov 2020

The appellant, BVM Finance Private Limited, was the original defendant No.1 in a commercial suit filed by the respondent No.1, Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Agency Agreement Dispute — Upholds Claim for Outstanding Invoices but Remits Interest Calculation. The court held that the arbitrator's award of interest at 18% per annum from the date of each invoice was contrary to the contract and Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which requires interest to run from the date of cause of action unless otherwise agreed.

21 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Aero Club, filed two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enforcement of Consent Terms Against Non-Signatory Defendant in Debenture Dispute. Interpretation of Consent Decree Held That Clause 11(a) Obligation to Pay Was Only on Defendant No.5, Not Defendant No.6, Who Was Not a Party to the Consent Terms.

29 Jan 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by the original Defendant No.5 (Dewanchand Ramsaran Trading Pvt. Ltd. and others) against a common order of the le...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries, Betting and Gambling Act, 2006 — Levy on Entry Fee for Games of Skill and Chance Upheld. The Court held that the tax on entry fee for games like poker, rummy, and bridge is a valid compensatory tax under Entry 62 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.

10 Apr 2012

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries, Betting and Gambling Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Lease Renewal Dispute — Option to Renew Lease Must Be Exercised Before Expiry of Term, Not After. Lease renewal option cannot be exercised after expiry of term; tenant holding over after expiry does not create right to renewal under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

29 Apr 2010

The case involves a dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), the applicant/defendant, and Navjeevan Co-operative Housing Society L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Service of notice under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 must be proved by actual delivery or proper postal endorsement; mere dispatch is insufficient.

4 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Ananda Rao Kanthamaneni, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Co...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)