Search Results for "Cadre Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Cadre Rules"

981 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 981 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Assistant Professor in University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. Selection based on merit and marks secured in interview upheld as per University Grants Commission Rules.

11 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Dr. Mahantesh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Dha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Engineers Seeking Employment with MSEB Holding Co. Ltd. — Directs Consideration of Candidature for Vacant Posts. The court held that the respondents must consider the petitioners for appointment against available or future vacancies in a fair and transparent manner, as the action of not appointing selected candidates without valid reason is arbitrary.

29 Feb 2024

The petitioners, nine individuals who were selected as Assistant Engineers by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) Holding Co. Ltd., filed a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Engineers Seeking Employment with MSEB Holding Co. Ltd. — Directs Consideration of Candidature for Vacant Posts. The court held that selected candidates have a right to be considered for appointment against available vacancies, and the respondents cannot arbitrarily deny appointment.

29 Feb 2024

The petitioners, nine individuals who were selected as Assistant Engineers by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) Holding Co. Ltd., filed a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

8 Dec 2021

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Punjab State Power Corporation in Pay Parity Dispute Between Head Clerks and Internal Auditors. Internal Auditors Not Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Head Clerks Due to Different Recruitment, Duties, and Promotional Avenues.

8 Jan 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (appellant) and Rajesh Kumar Jindal and others (respondents), who are I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition in Service Law Dispute Over Group Classification. The court upheld the MAT's declaration that Group 'C' employees are immune from the Revenue Division Allotment Rules, 2015, which apply only to Group 'A' and 'B' posts.

2 Nov 2018

The case involves a challenge by the Director of Accounts and Treasuries (M.S.), Mumbai and others (petitioners) against a judgment of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds State's Power to Appoint CEOs Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Rules, 2014 — Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointments Quashed. The court held that the appointments were valid under Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Appointment of Chief Executive Officer) Rules, 2014 and the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.

27 Dec 2016

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) which set ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion and Seniority in MIDC — Petitioner Granted Deemed Date of Promotion with Consequential Benefits. Court Holds That Sealed Cover Procedure Cannot Be Applied When No Punishment Is Imposed and That Promotion Must Be Granted from the Date of Eligibility.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Prabhakar Jagguji Rangari, joined the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) in 1978 as an Overseer and was promoted th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seniority Fixation in Judicial Service — Petitioner's Continuous Service from Initial Appointment Entitles Her to Seniority Over Colleague. Transfer on Request Does Not Break Continuity for Seniority Purposes Under Karnataka Judicial Department Rules.

2 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Mrs. Elize Mascarehnas, was appointed as a typist in the SDA cadre on 21.06.1985 in the District and Sessions Court, Kodagu District, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotions of Education Extension Officers — Seniority and Reservation Rules Upheld. Petitioners failed to establish violation of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Service) Rules, 1969 in promotions of respondents.

2 Jul 2010

The petitioners, five individuals initially appointed as Assistant Teachers in Zilla Parishad schools, challenged the promotion of Respondent Nos.5 to...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)