Search Results for "Article 246"

561 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 561 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Tribunal Rejecting Plea for Award on Majority Settlement. Industrial Tribunal Found Majority Settlement Voluntary but Held It Not Binding on Non-Signatory Union Members Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The management of Caterpillar India Private Limited, a multinational manufacturing off-road vehicles, and its recognized union, Caterpillar India Priv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging VAT Investigation Post-GST. Section 78 of Maharashtra GST Savings Act Held Valid as It Continues VAT Act Only for One Year from Appointed Day as Permitted by Constitution Amendment.

The petitioner, Magma Fincorp Limited, a non-banking finance company registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (VAT Act), challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Hotels and Restaurants. Sub-clauses (ZZZZV) and (ZZZZW) of Section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2011 held to be within legislative competence of Parliament.

The case involves three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court. The petitioners ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shaikh Umer Hyder Phuleri, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Taimur by stabbing. The prosecution's case relied on t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Detention Order Beyond Three Months Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Interpretation of 'Such Detention' in Article 22(4)(a) of the Constitution Confirmed to Refer to Preventive Detention, Not Period of Detention.

The case involved a constitutional challenge to an order of preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, as amended. The appellant, ...