Supreme Court Rules Appeal Does Not Abate if Estate is Sufficiently Represented.
12 Jan 2026This judgment concerns two connected civil appeals arising from suits for specific performance and eviction. In Civil Appeal No. 172 of 2026, the High...
Search Results for "voidable decree"
240 result(s) found
Found 240 result(s)
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sale of New Tenure Land by Adivasi Requires Government Permission; Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.
7 Jan 2026The appellant, Shantaben Gopalbhai Tadvi, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent jud...
- 156
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Dispute — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Lack of Application of Mind. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC Injunction Granted Without Proper Consideration of Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss.
24 Jul 2025The appellant, Sri Yathievendra Naik @ Yathish, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Held Sham and Not Intended to Be Acted Upon. Evidence Act Sections 91 and 92 Do Not Bar Proof of Sham Transaction; Subsequent Purchasers Are Bona Fide Purchasers Without Notice.
9 Jul 2024The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 7th December 1981 executed by the first defendant in favour of th...
- 406
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Succession Case — Marriage of Deceased with Applicant No.1 Proved Valid, Entitling Her and Daughter to Succession Certificate. Court holds that presumption of marriage under Section 114 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 applies when long cohabitation and public recognition are established, and that the Succession Court cannot decide title but only grant certificate to the person entitled.
3 Oct 2023The applicants, Smt. Aruna Gautam Kamble and her minor daughter Sneha, filed a Miscellaneous Application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Ac...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Valid Despite Non-Examination of Attesting Witness. Execution of sale deed can be proved by other evidence under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 when attesting witness is dead.
11 Apr 2023The appellant-plaintiff, Sri Thammaiah, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction (later amended to possession) in respect of sui...
- 81
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contract Refund Dispute — Interest on Principal Not Payable from Date of Deposit When Contract Not Void or Breached. Gujarat Maritime Board Not Liable to Pay Interest for Period Before Abandonment of Contract Under Indian Contract Act, 1872.
24 Nov 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman, Gujarat Maritime Board, against the judgment of the Gujar...
- 187
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Annulment of Marriage Due to Suppression of Incurable Skin Disease by Wife. Fraudulent Concealment of Material Facts Renders Marriage Voidable Under Section 12(1)(c) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
16 Feb 2016The appellant husband, Mayank Malhotra, filed two appeals under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging a common judgment dated 23.07.2...
- 376
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition for Unascertained Damages Claim — Lock-in Period License Fee Not a Debt Under Companies Act, 1956. Claim for balance license fee after premature vacation is a claim for damages requiring adjudication, not a debt due and payable under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.
28 Feb 2014The petitioning-creditor, Indiabulls Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, against ...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Ex-Parte Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Set Aside Decree Due to Delay and Lack of Sufficient Cause. The court held that the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC was time-barred and that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any valid reason for their absence in the suit.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a writ petition and a civil revision application filed by the petitioners, who were defendants in a suit for specific performance of...
- 59
