Search Results for "unscrupulous litigants"

139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case — Directors of Company Not Entitled to Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC When Trial Already Commenced and No Exceptional Circumstances Shown.

The petitioners, Mrs. Shama G. Bothe and Mr. Guido Bothe, directors of Chinkara Motors Private Limited (CMPL), filed a criminal writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Interim Orders in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that orders were not sufficiently clear and specific to warrant contempt proceedings, and the remedy lies in execution.

The petitioner, Sri Sai Krishna Constructions, filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of two orders passed by the Bombay High Court i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Probate Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Grounds. Petitioners failed to establish any ground for revocation under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, as they were aware of the probate for over 30 years.

The petitioners, who are heirs of the deceased Andrew Satiro D'Cunha, filed a petition under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Execution Order in Eviction Suit — Mundkar Claim Rejected, Adverse Possession Not Proven. The executing court erred in dismissing execution on the ground of adverse possession when the decree was valid and the issue was already decided.

The petitioners, Miss Aura Serafina Crispina de Souza and Miss Agnes Felicia de Souza, are the original decree-holders who obtained an eviction decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Singapore Seller Against Indian Buyer. Rejects Objections Based on Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses and Public Policy Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd., a Singapore-based company, filed a petition under Sections 47 and 48 of the Arbitration ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Nariman Point Car Parking Project Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as an appeal.

The petitioners, Nariman Point Association and another, filed a review petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the...