Search Results for "tenant alternative accommodation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "tenant alternative accommodation"

161 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Composite Lease Plea Rejected. Landlord's Bona Fide Requirement for Own Use and Occupation Upheld Under Section 10(3)(b) of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960.

27 Feb 2026

The revision petition was filed by the tenant, G.Mohan @ Mohanendran, against the concurrent orders of eviction passed by the Rent Controller and the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Between Brothers — Sets Aside Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession. Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership and Adverse Possession Against Co-Owner Brother.

21 Feb 2025

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 07.11.2007 in O.S.No.3163/1990 passed by the XV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Recasting of Issues in Tenancy Suit — No Error in Trial Court's Discretion. The Court held that the trial court's refusal to recast issues under Order XIV Rule 5 CPC was not perverse or arbitrary, as the proposed issues were already covered by existing issues.

21 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Mr. Jitendra B. Mehta, filed a suit (R.A.D. Suit No.804 of 2010) before the Small Causes Court at Bombay seeking a declaration of tena...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition in Eviction Suit Under Bombay Rent Act — Bonafide Requirement, Non-User, and Nuisance Not Proved. Concurrent findings of trial and appellate courts upheld that landlords failed to establish grounds for eviction under Section 13(1)(g) and (k) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

17 Jul 2017

The petitioners, landlords of a shop admeasuring 7 x 9½ sq ft in Nashik, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 570 of 1983 against the respondent tenant seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Eviction Petition for Bonafide Need of Residential Accommodation Under Section 13(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court restored the trial court's eviction decree, holding that the appellate court's finding of sufficient alternative accommodation was perverse and not supported by evidence.

27 Mar 2017

The petitioners, two elderly sisters aged 73 and 71, were the owners of a house property in Nagpur consisting of ground plus two floors. They resided ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.

7 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Article 227. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless perversity or error of law is shown.

7 Dec 2012

The petitioners, Anthony Jose Nazareth Rodrigues and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Cost of Repair/Reconstruction of Tenanted Premises Held Capital in Nature. The court held that the contribution of Rs.1.50 Crores by the tenant-assessee for repair/restoration of the building was capital expenditure, not allowable as revenue deduction under Section 30(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

30 Jan 2012

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Concurrent Findings of Default in Payment of Rent and Subletting Upheld. The court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot be used to re-appreciate evidence when findings are not perverse.

22 Jul 2005

The petitioners, Smt. Subhadrabai Shankar Raut, Shri Vinayak Shankar Raut, Shri Prakash Shankar Raut, and Shri Vilas Shankar Raut, were tenants of a p...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)