Search Results for "tenancy surrender"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Family Property Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on possession and tenancy rights upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Anil Sital Hansrajani and another, who are brothers and sons of the respondent Sital T. Hansrajani, filed a petition under Section 34...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses LIC's Revision Against Eviction Order for Unauthorized Subletting. Lease Agreement Prohibited Subletting Without Consent; Subletting to Multiple Tenants Constituted Breach Justifying Eviction Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The case involves a lease agreement executed on 16/12/1960 between the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai (Plaintiff/Respondent) and the Life Ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Eviction Petition Under Hyderabad Tenancy Act — Landlord's Bona Fide Need for Personal Cultivation Not Established. Appeal Allowed as Tenant Failed to Prove Landlord's Lack of Bona Fide Need Under Section 98 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950.

The petitioner, Kisan Sayaji Shelke, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) at Aurangabad, which all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Dispute Involving Surplus Land and Tenancy Rights. Court upholds Single Judge's order confirming that land was not surplus and appellants were not entitled to restoration of possession under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Bombay Tenancy Act.

The case involves three Letters Patent Appeals arising out of writ petitions decided by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur. The appella...