Search Results for "taxing provision interpretation"

357 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 357 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Entry Tax on Goods. Petitioners Argue That Differential Tax Burden on Imported LNG and Air Conditioners Violates Constitutional Provisions, Relying on Jindal Stainless Steel Principle.

Three writ petitions were heard together by the Bombay High Court, all challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on the Entry of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Input Tax Credit Under KVAT Act. Interpretation of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Availment of Input Tax Credit Irrespective of Invoice Month Framed the Core Issue.

A batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by various companies including...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxability of Interest Received on Enhanced Motor Accident Compensation. Petitioner Claims Interest is Capital Receipt and Not Taxable; Revenue Relies on Sections 56(2)(viii) and 145A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, a 48-year-old man rendered paraplegic and bedridden since a road accident at age 8, filed a writ petition challenging the taxability o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates TDS Obligations of Turf Clubs on Stake Money Payments to Horse Owners under Income Tax Act. Interpretation of Section 194B and CBDT Circulars Central to Dispute over Characterization of Stake Money as Winnings.

The case involved writ petitions filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited, Mysore Race Club Limited, Karnataka Race Horse Owners Association, and an indiv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Search Action Under Section 132 Cannot Be Basis for Reopening Beyond Four Years Without New Tangible Evidence.

The petitioner, Mahesh Dharamshi Prajapati, an individual and major partner of PSY Group engaged in real estate business, filed his return of income f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Rules Petition Challenging Vires of Amending Act Not Rendered Infructuous Despite Subsequent Amendment; Restitution Claim Keeps Issue Alive. Court Examines Validity of Tax on Electricity Charges Under Karnataka Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) Act, 1959.

(1) Background: The writ petitions were filed by several companies (textile mills, etc.) and the Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Indu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Service Tax Demand on Payment Aggregator Services for FY 2015-16. Services Provided by FIS Payment Solutions to Acquiring Banks for Settlement of Card Transactions Held Not Taxable as 'Business Auxiliary Service' Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, FIS Payment Solutions and Services India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, provides payment aggre...