Search Results for "substantial question of law"

981 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 981 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Show Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract.

The appellant, Amit Vijay Bhatewara, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31st March 2022 passed by the learned District Judge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Advertisement Expenses Classification Case. ITAT's finding that advertisement expenses are revenue expenses upheld as per Supreme Court precedent.

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue (DY CIT - C C - 1 BARODA) against the respondent-assessee (RINKI PETROCHEMICALS & IND LTD) challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Confirms Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Valuation. Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 applies to suit for possession based on title, and valuation under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 is not a jurisdictional issue.

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Appellants' challenge to 1965 acquisition notification filed in 1992 held time-barred under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 and earlier writ petition dismissal operates as res judicata.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in 1992 seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of two suit properties bear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Holding That Defendant No. 2 Failed to Establish Adverse Possession Over Suit Property. The Court Set Aside Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts and Remanded the Matter for Fresh Consideration on the Issue of Adverse Possession.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit filed by the plaintiff (Sitaram) against defendants no. 1 (Pandharinath) and no. 2 (Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Appellant failed to show any substantial question of law arising from concurrent findings of courts below regarding possession and title of suit property.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Sou. Sheetal Ulhas Dangi, who was the original defendant no.22, against the judgment and decree passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Limitation. Court holds that the appellate court failed to consider the effect of prior partition and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute among family members. The appellants (defendants) are the legal representatives of the original defendant, and th...