Search Results for "retirement recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "retirement recovery"

481 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 481 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Appointment of Receiver. Court sets aside order appointing receiver for partnership firm M/s Sea Line Trading, holding that the trial court failed to consider the balance of convenience and the fact that the appellant was a partner in possession of the firm's assets.

8 Apr 2026

The case involves a commercial appeal filed under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the CPC, challenging ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order and Remands for Fresh Inquiry in Sexual Harassment Dispute. The court held that imposing major penalty under Section 13(3)(i) of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 requires separate inquiry under Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, as applicable to IIT Bombay employees, beyond Internal Complaints Committee proceedings.

24 Mar 2026

The High Court of Bombay adjudicated a writ petition filed by a professor at IIT Bombay challenging his compulsory retirement order based on sexual ha...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Against Retired Employee in Service Pay Excess Case — Recovery Impermissible When Not Due to Employee's Fault. Recovery of Excess Pay from Terminal Benefits of Retired Employee Declared Illegal Under Article 226; Amount Already Deducted Ordered to Be Refunded with 6% Interest.

6 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a retired employee of Anna University, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a recovery order dated 16.07.2019 and seeki...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Lokayukta Directions in Vehicle Registration Dispute — Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Impugned Letters Issued Without Authority and Without Hearing Petitioner Are Set Aside.

20 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Chandrashekar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash several letters/directio...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement and Pension Cut of Municipal Employee in Corruption Case Despite Acquittal. Departmental Enquiry Entrusted by Urban Development Department Held Competent and Acquittal in Criminal Case Found Not to Vitiate Penalty under Karnataka Lokayukta Act.

29 May 2020

The petitioner, a municipal employee who served as in-charge Chief Officer of Town Municipal Council, challenged the compulsory retirement and permane...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Challenge to Recovery of Excess Pension Paid Due to Mistaken Inclusion of Promotional Increment. Recovery of excess payment after six years of retirement held impermissible as per principles against recovery from retired employees.

3 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Tarachand s/o Urkudaji Gajbhiye, a retired government employee, was aggrieved by an order dated 19.1.2016 issued by respondent No. 2, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Dispute Case: Bank Employee Entitled to Pension Despite Joining New Post Without Reporting Back to Parent Department. The Court held that denial of pension under Clause 22(2) of Syndicate Bank Employees Pension Regulations, 1995 was unjustified as there was no interruption in service.

27 Mar 2019

The appellant, Narendra Kumar, joined Syndicate Bank as a Law Officer in 1979. He went on deputation to the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debt Reco...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Refund of Excess Salary Paid Due to Negligence of Employees Not Recoverable. Held that recovery from employees for no fault of theirs would be unjust and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

24 Aug 2016

The petitioner, the erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 31/01/2005 and 27/01/2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Refund of Recovery Ordered for Negligence in Retirement Processing. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that recovery of salary paid due to employer's negligence constitutes unfair labour practice under the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

24 Aug 2016

The petitioner, the erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), challenged two judgments of the Industrial Court dated 31/01/2005 and 27/01/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Teacher Against Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Mistakenly During Service. Recovery of Mistaken Payment After Retirement Held Illegal Following Supreme Court Precedent in State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

1 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Lata Gajanan Wankhede, a retired Assistant Teacher employed with Zilla Parishad, Akola, filed a writ petition challenging the recovery...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)