Search Results for "phenolphthalein"

107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constable in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shrikrushna s/o Janardhan Chaudhari, was a Police Constable attached to Akot Police Station. On 15.1.1993, he along with other constabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Deorao Marotrao Bhagatkar, was the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Madhukar Nagnathrao Bandale, was a Junior Clerk in Upper Painganga Project, Sub-Division No.3, Isapur. The complainant, Ganpat Kasture ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sukhdeo Laxman Parale, was a Talathi (village revenue officer) in Phulumri, Yavatmal. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Pusad, for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Defective Sanction and Probable Defence. Demand for Amount Held to Be Visit Fees and Medicine Expenses, Not Illegal Gratification, Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

This criminal appeal arises from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, a veterinary doctor employed at Panchayat S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction Under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Shadow Panch's Evidence Contradicted Complainant's Version.

The complainant, Pradip Jogi, sought a 7/12 extract with a loan entry from the accused, a Talathi, in November 2001. The accused allegedly demanded a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Income Tax Officer in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Smt. K. Chandrika, an Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, was convicted by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore, for offences u...