KAHC020042082025_1
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "permissible classification"
816 result(s) found
Found 816 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Division Bench Pronounces Judgment on Constitutional Validity of Karnataka Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2023 and Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 2023. The Verdict on the Appeal and Connected Petition Remains Unstated in the Available Excerpt of the Judgment.
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, heard a writ appeal a...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Industrial Plot to Residential Zone in Town Planning Scheme — Arbitrary Zoning Violates Article 14. Petitioner's plot in I-2 zone surrounded by residential properties; court holds that zoning must be rational and non-arbitrary, and directs conversion on payment of premium under DCPR 2034.
9 Oct 2023The petitioner, Rational Art & Press Private Limited, owned Final Plot No. 951(A) on Appasaheb Marathe Marg, Mumbai, which was zoned as industrial (I-...
- 59
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.
1 Jan 2023The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...
- 175
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Scope of Section 34 Arbitration Act in National Highways Acquisition Disputes - The court considered whether modification of arbitral awards is permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly for compensation awards under the National Highways Act, 1956.
20 Jul 2021The Supreme Court addressed a significant legal question regarding the scope of judicial intervention under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...
- 437
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Act Case Due to Arbitrary Stay Provision. The Third Proviso to Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Was Struck Down as It Automatically Vacated Stay Orders After 365 Days Without Considering Assessee's Responsibility for Delay, Violating Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
6 Apr 2021The Supreme Court of India addressed a batch of civil appeals concerning the constitutional validity of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) of the In...
- 219
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement Without Sanction — Proceedings Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Violation of Regulation 16(3) of BESCOM/KPTCL CDA Regulations, 1975
17 Jul 2019The petitioners, former employees of BESCOM and KPTCL, retired from service between 2014 and 2016. After their retirement, disciplinary proceedings we...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Non-Cumulative Age Relaxation in Public Service Recruitment — Conflicting Division Bench Decisions Resolved. Age relaxation for multiple categories (physically handicapped, reserved category) cannot be cumulated unless rules expressly provide for cumulative benefit.
13 Dec 2018The Maharashtra Public Service Commission filed two writ petitions challenging orders that allowed cumulative age relaxation to candidates who were bo...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Married Sister's Claim for Compassionate Appointment — Government Resolution Excluding Married Sisters Held Unconstitutional. The court struck down the policy as discriminatory under Articles 14, 15, and 16 of the Constitution, holding that marital status is not a valid criterion for denying compassionate appointment to a sister who is a dependent of the deceased employee.
11 Oct 2017The petitioners, Swapanali Shekhar Kalbhor (married sister of the deceased employee) and Gulabbai Kailash Sathe (mother), filed a writ petition under ...
- 152
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Minority Scholarship Schemes as Constitutional — Schemes for Minority Communities Do Not Violate Article 14 or 15(1) as They Are Based on Backwardness and Not Religion Alone.
6 Jun 2011The Bombay High Court disposed of two public interest litigations challenging the constitutional validity of two scholarship schemes for minority comm...
- 93
