Search Results for "penetration"

205 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Manoj s/o Harihar Shukla, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Ahmednagar, in Special (POCSO) Case No.199 of 2017 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age — Benefit of Doubt Given as Prosecution Failed to Establish Minority of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 4, 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ashik Ramjan Ansari, was convicted by the Special Judge at Greater Bombay in POCSO Special Case No.203 of 2016 for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rape Case Against Applicant in Consensual Relationship with Promise to Marry — No Offence of Rape Made Out When Physical Relations Were Consensual and Promise to Marry Was Not False from Inception.

The applicant, Devendra s/o Vikas Pawar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) IPC, Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302/120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, was set aside as the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt with credible and corroborative evidence.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, which upheld the conviction of the appellants under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Sexual Assault Fails as Prosecutrix's Testimony is Unreliable and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Penetration Under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Vishakha Fadte, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence, Establishing Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Rape Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.

The appellant, Devanand S/o Tarakram Bhagat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur, in Spl. (POCSO) Case No. 122/2016 for offences ...