Search Results for "notification under Section 16(2)"

453 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 453 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Petitions to Quash Dowry Harassment Charge Sheet and Strike Down Government Notification Conferring CCB Police Powers. Petitioners Challenge Investigation Transfer and Jurisdictional Validity Under Criminal Procedure Code and Karnataka Police Act.

Background: The case involved matrimonial disputes between a husband, Ditul Mehta (accused No.1), and his wife, Esha Raj (de facto complainant). The c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Revision Application Under Indian Forest Act. Minister's order set aside for non-application of mind and failure to consider material evidence regarding agricultural character of land.

The petitioner, Vijayalaxmi Shrinivas Panditrao, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 20th August, 2019 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes Writ Petitions Challenging Reservation and Voter List for Mayor Elections. Court Relies on Principle that Election Process Should Not Be Stalled by Judicial Intervention Absent Grave Illegality.

These writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Port Trust's Eviction Notices for Unauthorized Occupants. Held that lessees/licensees whose tenures expired and who continued in possession without consent are unauthorized occupants liable to eviction under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by various entities who were originally lessees or licensees of land belonging to the Board of T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Amendments to Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Deletion of 'Trader' from Section 72 and Insertion of Rule 76-A are Unconstitutional.

The present proceedings comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Government Order Appointing Administrator for Vyasaraja Mutt. Petitioners Allege That the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 Does Not Apply to the Mutt and Seek Quashing of the Administrator's Appointment.

The case involved two writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka challenging the Government orders dated 26.05.2012 appointing an administrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Railway Project. Publication in Official Gazette and Local Newspapers Held Sufficient Compliance Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, 70 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of their lands for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...