Search Results for "motor vehicles offences"

342 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 342 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Minor in Motor Accident Case, Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. The court held that notional income for a deceased minor should be Rs. 30,000 per annum as per Kishan Gopal, and enhanced conventional heads to Rs. 70,000 as per Pranay Sethi.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim petition. The claimants, Hanamant Dundappa Narale and Mahadevi, parents of a decease...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Fatal Hit-and-Run Case Alleging Police Bias. Court finds no exceptional circumstances warranting transfer, holds that investigation is progressing and petitioner's grievances can be addressed by trial court.

The petitioner, Shahrukh Ziya Mohammad, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellant in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused drove in a rash or negligent manner causing death.

The appellant, Sagar Lolienkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, South Goa, Margao, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. The Court apportioned liability 50:50 between the car driver and the truck driver, reducing the insurer's liability from full award to 50%.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of a deceased pillion rider. The deceased was riding pillion on a motor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Motor Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash Driving. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act as No Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving Was Adduced.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 16 April 19...