Search Results for "mortgage enforcement"

397 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 397 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Possession and Title. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Sri B.S. Lakshman, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenant's Claim Not Established. The court held that the appellant failed to prove tenancy and that the remedy under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act is available to any person aggrieved, including tenants.

The appellant, Modinasab Indikar, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the order of the District Magistrate, Salcete, d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 25% Pre-deposit for Waiver of Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Legal Heirs of Guarantor Must Deposit 25% of Section 13(2) Notice Amount as Condition for Hearing Appeal on Merits.

The petitioners, Smt. Julie Amitabh Parekh and others, who are the legal heirs of the deceased guarantor Amitabh Arun Parekh, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture Orders — Bank's Mortgage Rights Protected as Prior Encumbrance. The Court held that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA does not extinguish a prior bona fide mortgage created before the issuance of the show cause notice.

The Petitioner, Development Credit Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging EPF Attachment Over SFC Sale Property. Section 11(2) of EPF Act, 1952 creates overriding first charge on assets, enforceable against purchaser in SFC sale, not limited to insolvency or winding up.

The petitioner, M/s. Indus Agro Products, was a purchaser in a sale conducted by the State Financial Corporation under the State Financial Corporation...