Search Results for "managerial"

285 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 285 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Implement Award and Settlement Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Tata Yazaki Autocomp Ltd., a company manufacturing wire harness for the automobile sector employing around 500 permanent workmen in Pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Industrial Court Order for Failure to Frame Preliminary Issue on Workman Status. Employer's Application to Decide Whether Complainant is a Workman Under MRTU & PULP Act Must Be Considered as Preliminary Issue.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Rajya Kapus Utpadak Panan Mahasangh Marayadit, challenged the judgment and order dated 10th March 2010 passed by the learn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Union of India and Government Presses Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award. Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Invalid Due to Existing Settlement Under Section 2(p) of the Act.

The Union of India and the managements of India Security Press and Currency Note Press, Nashik, filed a writ petition challenging the award of the Cen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Clubbing of Establishments Under EPF Act. Common Ownership and Same Telephone Number Justify Clubbing for Coverage Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s. Kiran Agencies, a proprietary firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged the order dated 30.03.2005 passed by the Em...