Search Results for "locus standi"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "locus standi"

1163 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1163 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Application Under Section 434 Companies Act Seeking Transfer of Winding-Up Petition to NCLT. Applicant Argues No Irreversible Steps Taken, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.

23 Jun 2026

The matter arose from a Company Petition filed in 2010 seeking winding up of Broadcast Infratel India Private Limited on grounds of unpaid admitted de...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Dismissed Employee Seeking Action Against Transport Corporation Officials — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Disciplinary Proceedings Already Initiated.

3 Jun 2026

The petitioner, S. Murugesan, a dismissed employee of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Slum Rehabilitation Tenement Dispute. Court holds that Trial Court erred in not considering balance of convenience and irreparable loss while rejecting injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

29 Sep 2023

The appellants, Fayzan Khan, Devendra Mishra, Firoz Ismail Khan, and Rajesh Kanojiya, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Dindoshi seeking a decla...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi and Erroneous Lapse Declaration. Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Precluding Lapse.

16 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with a notification dated 17.06.2005 and declaration under S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi. High Court's declaration of acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 is set aside as subsequent purchasers cannot challenge acquisition proceedings.

13 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against a judgment and order dated 17.07.2017 passed by the High Court of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Co-Accused's Impleadment Plea in Victim's Further Investigation Application — No Locus Standi for Charge-Sheeted Accused in Proceedings Under Section 173(8) CrPC Against Another Uncharged Person. The Court held that a charge-sheeted accused has no right to be heard in a petition challenging the rejection of an application for further investigation against another accused who has not been charge-sheeted.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Satishkumar Nyalchand Shah, was one of the accused charge-sheeted in connection with the collapse of Shikhar Apartment in Ahmedabad dur...

High Court

High Court of Judicature of Bombay Quashes State Government Interference in Municipal Election Process, Upholds Bar on Court Intervention Post-Notification. Court Holds That Once Election Process is Imminent, Courts Should Not Interfere, Reiterating the Role of State Election Commission and the Exclusivity of Election Petitions.

2 Dec 2016

The writ petition was filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court by Shilpa Pardeshi against the State of Maharashtra, the State Electi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and suit was filed beyond three years from notice of refusal under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Sandeep Kashinath Parab, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15/06/1998 allegedly executed by the respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Arbitral Award in Family Property Dispute — Consent Terms Valid as Arbitration Agreement. Court holds that consent terms recorded in earlier proceedings constitute a valid arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and that the arbitral tribunal did not err in awarding interest on delayed payment of consideration.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the petitioners, Narendra Ramprakash Podar and others, challenging an arbitral award dated 30 September ...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)