Search Results for "lifestyle"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Adverse Possession Suit — Trial Court Decree Restored. First Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Remanding Suit for Filing Written Statement Despite Proper Procedure Being Followed.

The case arises from a suit for declaration of ownership based on adverse possession filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against the defendant (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2019

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ex Parte Order Restraining Husband from Entering His Own Residence in Domestic Violence Case. Order Passed Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 23(2) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Siddharth Sabharwal, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession of Tenanted Flat Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Dispute Between Siblings Over Possession of Flat Held Exclusively Triable by Small Causes Court, Not Civil Court.

The plaintiff, Arun Bhaskar Adarkar, a senior citizen of Indian origin residing in the USA, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking possession o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Deduction and Depreciation Rate is Invalid.

The petitioner, Aventis Pharma Ltd., challenged a notice dated 16th March 2009 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...