Search Results for "inconsistent testimonies"

460 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 460 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecutrix Testimony and Material Contradictions. Appeal under Section 378 CrPC Dismissed as Trial Court's Findings Not Perverse.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment dated 25.04.2003 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Arvind Ganpat Lavte (Accused No.1), Vijay @ Bapu Chimaji Bhutekar (Accused No.2), and Pandit ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl - Upholds Conviction Under Sections 376, 302 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and DNA Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl on 5th September 2013. The victim, a student of ITI, was last seen by her mother at Asa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Trial Court's Findings Were Not Perverse.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 25th November 1999 passed by the learned Additional Distric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 326, 396 read with 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 10th December 2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witness and Medical Inconsistencies. Acquittal of accused under Section 302 IPC upheld as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 13th July 2001 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ratnag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Wasudeo s/o Madhukar Khadatkar, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Naresh Mankar under Section 302 of the Indian Penal ...