Search Results for "impermissible recovery"

706 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 706 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Caste Insult. Conviction under Sections 302, 341, 294(b), 506(ii) IPC r/w SC/ST Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove caste-based motive and murder beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal by Rajesh, Mahadevan, and Anand (Accused Nos.1, 2, and 6) against their conviction and sentence by the I Additional and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Flawed Circumstantial Evidence. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity and Circumstantial Evidence Was Unreliable Under Section 397 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Nagaraja (Accused No.4) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had reversed his acquittal and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery Notices for Excess Wages Paid to Employees. Recovery of wages paid under mistake of law held impermissible without prior notice and opportunity of hearing.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 30/09/2005 passed by the Industrial Court, L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...